$SWARMS vs $BURNIE: social heat, real people, market size
swarms has a Heat Score of 46 with 49 contributors in 24h; Burnie Senders scores 78 with 122. $BURNIE has 2.5× the human conversation of $SWARMS, while $SWARMS is 5.6× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $SWARMS | $BURNIE |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 46 (Warm) | 78 (On fire) |
| Contributors 24h | 49 | 122 |
| Interactions 24h | 6.6K | 48.1K |
| Posts 24h | 69 | 430 |
| Sentiment | 89/100 | 96/100 |
| Spam share 7d | 30.1% | 6.2% |
| Price | $0.007788 | $0.001444 |
| 24h change | +1.9% | -20.6% |
| Market cap | $7.80M | $1.40M |
| Rank | #957 | #1612 |
| From all-time high | -98.7% | -94.1% |
| Age | 21 months old | 5 months old |
| Chain | solana | solana |
| DEX liquidity | $1.53M | $252.57K |
| CEX listings | 15 | 1 |
| Social dominance | 0.014% | 0.089% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 02:09 UTC; Burnie Senders: Sep 5, 01:56 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $SWARMS stands in the memecoin rankings
$SWARMS is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $SWARMS vs $COPPERINU · $SWARMS vs $PUMP · $SWARMS vs $DJT · $SWARMS vs $BITTY · $SWARMS vs $SHRUB