$SWARMS vs $WIFH: social heat, real people, market size
swarms has a Heat Score of 46 with 49 contributors in 24h; WIFH scores 66 with 13. $SWARMS has 3.8× the human conversation of $WIFH, while .
| Metric | $SWARMS | $WIFH |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 46 (Warm) | 66 (Hot) |
| Contributors 24h | 49 | 13 |
| Interactions 24h | 6.6K | 9.8K |
| Posts 24h | 69 | 36 |
| Sentiment | 89/100 | 100/100 |
| Spam share 7d | 30.1% | 1.9% |
| Price | $0.007788 | $0.0001068 |
| 24h change | +1.9% | -3.0% |
| Market cap | $7.80M | $0 |
| Rank | #957 | #4732 |
| From all-time high | -98.7% | -85.0% |
| Age | 21 months old | 15 months old |
| Chain | solana | |
| DEX liquidity | $1.53M | — |
| CEX listings | 15 | 0 |
| Social dominance | 0.014% | 0.007% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 02:09 UTC; WIFH: Sep 5, 01:58 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $SWARMS stands in the memecoin rankings
$SWARMS is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $SWARMS vs $COPPERINU · $SWARMS vs $PUMP · $SWARMS vs $DJT · $SWARMS vs $BITTY · $SWARMS vs $SHRUB